SECTION 5: READING TEST (30minutes)

Directions: Read the following passages and then answer IN  complete sentences the questions which follow each passage. Use only information from the passage you have just read and write your answer in the corresponding space in your ANSWER BOOKLET.

Questions 1~3 //tr.hjenglish.com
      It  wasn't  the abduction  of his 70-year-old  grandmother  that  led Alberto Peisach to  leave Colombia. Nor was it the 1997murder of his brother-in -law during a botched kidnap attempt. It was the planned abduction of his 6-year-old son that finally persuaded the Ivy League-educated entrepreneur  to pack his bags in less than 24hours and head to Miami with his wife and kids. Peisach has carved out a niche for himself in south Florida as the head of a $100 million private equity found. "A lot  of my  friends took bets on how  soon I'd be back home, but  80percent  of them  have  left,"  says  Peisach.  "The  Colombia  that  I  grew  up  in  doesn't  exist  anymore,  and anybody who's had a choice has left." //tr.hjenglish.com

      Alarmed by a slumping economy and the ever-present  menace of kidnapping, Colombia's best and brightest are leaving in droves. Some have settled in Spain and nearby Latin American countries, but nowhere is the exodus quite as visible as in Miami. The city's 70,000 Colombians recently  overtook  Nicaraguans  as the  largest  immigrant  community  after  Cubans.  Legions  of professionals are moving into affluent  suburbs. Membership  of Commerce has doubled in just the  past  18months.  The  big  winner    from  the  brain  drain  is  south  Florida. "Colombians are basically subsidizing Miami," says political scientist Eduardo Gamarra.

      Last  year's  U.S.  census  counted  470,000  residents  of  Colombian  origin  nationwide,  but some experts put the figure closer  to 600,000. The first  significant wave of immigration dates back to the  1950s, when  a brutal civil war  forced tens  of thousands to flee. Their ranks were bolstered in the 1980s by Colombians escaping the lawlessness associated with the rise of major drug cartels. But most of those earlier migrants bypassed Florida in favor of New York and New Jersey. Relatively  few brought  with them the First  World-caliber  education  and  experience of their recently arrived countrymen.

     Not  all  transplants  can  be  classified  as  refugees.  Miami's  unofficial  reputation  as Latin America's economic and showbiz capital has lured celebrities like pop diva Shakira and actress Sofia  Vergara.   And    some drug traffickers are  trying  to  blend   in  with their law-abiding countrymen to escape detection by authorities.

      But many more are escaping the anarchy of a land where eight people are kidnapped and nearly  100 are murdered on average every single day. Abel Meza Montoya was beaten up and left for dead by men identifying themselves as supporters of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia after the pool-hall owner refused to pay them  protection money I April.The 55-year-old father of six ignored their warnings at first, but in June Meza finally fled the country with his youngest daughter.

      The plight of such ordinary folks has inspired a two-year campaign to legalize an estimated 95,000 Colombians living illegally in America. Community leaders argue that these Colombians fear for their lives back home and  should qualify for temporary protected status, a short-term reprieve from deportation.  Clinton-administration officials brushed aside those pleas.But activists have enlisted the support of nearly 40 U.S. politicians in their continuing effort to buy some time for their countrymen. "There is a war being waged against civilians in Colombia financed by the sale of illicit drugs," says Juan Carlos Zapata of the Miami- based Colombian American Service Association. "As the world's biggest consumer of narcotics, the United States has a moral obligation to grant this relief." Having left their  country because of politics, many Colombians  show  little  inclination  to  challenge  the  Cuban  stranglehold  on  power  in  Miami. "People who come here are low profile," explains Isaac Lee, former editor of the respected news magazine  Seaman. who moved to Miami  last  year.  "They  want  to live peacefully." And  for these Colombians and thousands more clamoring to follow in their footsteps, Miami is the best alternative to a country that no longer offers security or hope.

1.Why does the author give the example of Alberto Peisach at the beginning of the passage?
2. Introduce briefly the three waves of Colombian immigration since the 1950S.
3. Give a brief explanation of political scientist Eduardo Gamarra' s comment that "Colombians
are basically subsidizing Miami."

Question 4~6 //tr.hjenglish.com
      "Study nature, not books!" advised the great 19th century naturalist Louis Agassiz. As a boy growing up in Alabama and northern Florida, Edward Osborne Wilson did both. By day he scoured  fields, forests and streams. At night he pored over books and magazines. It was an article in National Geographic ("Stalking Ants, Savage and Civilized") that launched, at the ripe age  of  9, one of the great scientific careers of the late 20th century, a career that began in entomology-with a particular passion for ants-  but  that has since reinvented itself  with remarkable frequency, expanding its scope to encompass not just the earth's smallest  creatures but the whole living planet.

      E.O. Wilson's  scientific  contributions  began  early.  He  was  13 when  he  discovered,  in  a vacant lot near the docks of Mobile, Ala., the first known U.S. colonies of fire ants, Solenopsis invicta, invaders from Brazil and Argentina known in the South as "the ants from hell."

      As an assistant professor at Harvard in the late 1950s, he proposed the radical notion that ant societies are bound together by an elaborate system of chemical signals.

      Meanwhile, Wilson was blazing  other  trails. Fascinated by ant  societies, he began  seeing parallels in the socials interactions of birds, lions, monkeys, apes and even humans. In a  1975 book audaciously titled Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, he charted in evolutionary terms the social architecture of a wide range of species-their breeding behavior, gender  dominance, caste systems. "In a Darwinian sense," Wilson wrote, "the organism does not live for itself. Its primary function  is not  even to reproduce  other  organisms; it reproduces  genes, and it  serves as their temporary carrier."  Wilson's   Sociobiology  was at  once   enormously   influential and hugely controversial. Its  first  26  chapters, which  dealt with the  social  systems  of  nonhuman  species, were  widely  praised  as  one  of  the  century's  signal  scientific achievements.  Its  27th  chapter, which  applied the  same  analysis  to  human  behavior  and  culture,  was  harshly-and  sometimes violently-attacked. Despite the mixed reaction, Wilson in this and subsequent books-culmination with Promethean Fire (1983)-accomplished something few scientists can claim. He established a new field as science. It is known to this day as sociobiology.

      By that  time, however, Wilson  had moved on. Drawing  from his  deep knowledge  of the earth's  "little  creatures"  and  his  sense  that  their  contribution  to  the  planet's  ecology is under appreciated, he produced what may be his most important book, The Diversity of Life(1992). In 424  pages  he  describes  how  an  intricately  interconnected  natural  system  is  threatened by a manmade biodiversity crisis he calls the "sixth extinction"—the most  devastating trauma since the extinction event that laid waste the dinosaurs and other creatures 65 million years ago.

      He notes in Diversity that the 1.5 million species named so far by scientists represent only a tiny fraction of the tens of millions that may be out there. Wilson's prediction that 30%to 50%of all species would be extinct by the middle of the 21st century was meant to provoke—and it did. Critics  rej ected  the  estimate  as  another  one  of  his  flamboyant  speculations.  But  subsequent research has supported it. From the perspective of the biodiversity scientist, virtually all the signs are bad.

      How can human society transform itself? How can we become stewards of the living world? To Wilson, what is requited is a new convergence of thought and ethics comparable to the Age of Enlightenment of the 17th and 18th  centuries. Now, at 72, E.O. Wilson  is a senior doyen of science and, by his own admission, moving irresistibly into what he calls" the literary realm." It's not  a  bad place  for  him  to be. Wilson  has produced  a  scientific  masterpiece  in  nearly every decade  of  his  life.  And  in  this  time  of  crisis,  our  planet  has  never  had more need for the observations and intuition of one of the world's great naturalists.

4. Give a brief introduction of E.O. Wilson and his research fields.
5. Why is Wilson's work Sociobiology "hugely controversial"? What is his main theory?
6. What is the major theme of his book The Diversity of Life? //tr.hjenglish.com

Questions 7~10 //tr.hjenglish.com
      Think  of yourself flying across the country. An  engine  starts sputtering; cause  for  alarm, sure, but the pilot does that folksy number—"Aw, shucks, little problem here"—and assures you the others can take the strain. Then a second engine goes out; the sweat trickles down your neck, but your reckon you'll make it to the ground safely. But if the third, and then the fourth, flame out

      The  global economy  hasn't  crashed  just yet. But a world—wide  slowdown  is giving analysts everywhere a bad case of the jitters. The key reason: this, says Robert Hormats, vice chairman of Goldman Sachs International, is "the first synchronized downturn since the 1980s," when  high  interest  rates  squeezed  the  world  economy like  an  orange.  During  the  last  U.S. recession,  10years ago, Europe was in its post—cold war euphoria, while the Asian economies were the stuff of miracle. By the time a financial crisis declared the Asian tigers in  1997—98, the U.S. economy was in the middle of its technology boom.

      This time around, both the U.S. and German economies are flatlining, while that of Japan continues its slow, downward spiral. The Japanese unemployment rate has risen to 5%, while the Nikkei stock market index last week touched lows not seen since  1984. The world's three most powerful engines are out ofjuice. Worry. //tr.hjenglish.com

      Why  are this year's  economic woes  so widespread? Blame  globalization, the  increase  in cross—border trade and investment, that has bound the world economy closer together than ever before. In good times, globalization spreads the wealth. The  astonishing growth of the  U.S. economy in the lat  1990s spilled over into countries from Taiwan (which makes the microchips that  power your computer) to Ireland (a prime destination for  U.S. firms   outsourcing manufacturing). But  globalization, it turns out, has a reverse  gear. Once it was plain—by  last winter—that  technology  firms had vastly  overestimated  demand, the  consequent  retrenchment spread far beyond the Bay Area. Last week, for example, Baltimore Technologies, the j ewel in Ireland's high—tech sector, slashedjobs in an effort to achieve profitability.

      Signs of global recession inevitably conjure up thoughts of the last time the whole world went to hell in a hand basket: the Great Depression of the 1930s.In truth, we're a long way from breadlines, and policymakers understand the forces that move the economy today much better than  they  did then. But  one  lesson  of the  1930s  is worth  remembering. In  an interconnected world, points out Jeffrey Garter, dean of the Yale school of management, a small spark can start a huge conflagration. In 1930 it looked as if the consequences of the 1929market crash might be contained; it was the collapse in  1931of the Austrian bank  Creditanstalt that  turned a  market correction into a worldwide slump. Similarly, the global financial crisis of 1997—98 started with the devaluation of the Thai  bath—though Thailand's  whole economy is about the size of Kentucky's.

      That's one reason why, after much dickering, the Administration last week signed off on an $8  billion  international  rescue  package  for  Argentina  (an  economy  about  the  size  of  North lending tax dollars paid by American plumbers and retail clerks to a country that careens from one  debt  crisis to the next. But  in  the  end,  as  Goldman  Sachs'  Hormats puts  it,  "pragmatism triumphed over ideology." If Argentina had defaulted on its debt, investors might have pulled out of other emerging markets, triggering a real crash. In a nervous world, It's best to avoid anything that  leads  to  a  loss  of  confidence.  Might  anything  else  tip  the  mood  from  mere  gloom  to atastrophe?  "A huge amount,"  says Yale Garten,  "is hinging  on the American  consumer." In today's  planes,  one really  strong  engine  can  get  you  safely  to  your  destination. But  expect  a bumpy ride. //tr.hjenglish.com

7. Why does the author begin the article with the description of one's flying experience?
8. Explain the sentence from paragraph 4 "But globalization, it turns out, has a reverse gear."
9. Why does the author mention the Great Depression of the 1930s?
10. What do you know about the arguments over the $8 billion international rescue package for  Argentina?


SECTION 6:TRANSLATION TEST (30 minutes)

Directions:    Translate  the  following    passage   into  English   and   write  your   version  in  the corresponding space in your ANSWER BOOKLET. //tr.hjenglish.com

历史雄辩地说明,中美之间建立在平等互利基础上的劳动分工是最为合理和实用的国际关系。中国物美价廉的制成品源源不断地走上美国超级市场的货架,而美国的农产品、 高新技术产品,连同跨国公司的资本和技术,滚滚不断地涌进中国内地。中国人民以其勤劳的双手,增进了美国的福祉,促使其产业升级换代 而北美这块广袤而又富饶的土地,也以其精华滋润和促进了中国的现代化进程。经贸合作是两国能够找到共同语言的最佳领域。以谋求共同利益来减少或淡化意识形态差异和利益冲突,过去是、今后更是双方寻求和平共处的必由之路。

下页更精彩:参考答案

【点击下载PDF完整版】  【返回口译真题试卷中心】