450)=450">
本期选段中Dr. Lightman他们在讨论那个高中生是否有预谋，但是貌似那位“官员”不太相信他们的工作，但是他的动作表情也同样出卖了自己，揭露了另一个隐情。。。会是什么呢？一起来看看吧~~大家不妨注意一下Dr. Lightman看人的表情，哈哈，局外人表示很好玩~~



So you got a sense of his intent?
When I asked James about his best race, he broke 1_________in order to remember and answer truthfully. And when I asked him about his run the night of the murder, he never broke eye contact. He wasn't recalling a memory. 2_______________.
But I thought most people avoid eye contact when they're lying.
No, it's a 3_____. And quite often, they make more eye contact. They need to watch, see if you 4________________.
The content analysis would suggest that James has been to Ms. McCartney's house before. Question: "Have you ever been to her house?" Answer: "No, I have never been to her house." Rigid repetion like that is typical of a lie.
Okay, so you'll tell the mayor's office the murder was premeditated? Looks that way. But when I asked him about his teacher's death, what we saw was this:
Oblique eyebrows.
5_______.
Why would he be hiding sadness for her?
6__________________.
It's possible he 7____________________.
Excuse me?
Could have been an accident.
Okay. Okay, I indulged the mayor's office in letting you talk to the kid, but now you're just making 8_________ that have no basis in 9________. This was no accident. And personally, I think what you do is a joke. It's a friggin' carnival act.
Oh, yeah, yeah, I get that a lot.

eye contact He was lying myth believe their lies Sadness Looks like guilt to me didn't mean to kill his teacher wild guesses hard evidence
知道他的目的了吗？ 我问起James的最好成绩，他终止了眼神交流，努力回忆并如实回答。但我问起谋杀当晚的跑步情况，他却一直看着我，并未回忆什么，而是在撒谎。 大部分人撒谎时都避免眼神交流的吧。 不，那是假的。他们会经常做更多眼神交流，他们需要观察，看你是否相信他们的谎言。 内容分析显示，James之前曾去过McCartney小姐的家。我问他“你之前去过她家吗？”回答“没有，我之前从未去过她家。”完全照搬的重复回答，是典型的谎言。 好了，你们能告诉市长他是有预谋的喽？ 似乎如此。 但当我说起老师的死，我们看到的是这个：眉毛挂下来了。 悲伤。为什么要掩饰悲伤呢？ 我看是罪恶感。 也有可能，他不是有意杀人。 什么？ 可能是意外。 是吗？我迁就市长办公室的人，让你跟这个孩子谈，现在你却在无可靠证据的情况下大胆猜测，这不是意外。我个人觉得，你们这一行简直是笑话，完全随心所欲嘛。 是啊，是啊，经常有人这么说。