文章较难，大家听写填空即可~
If Alice is smart, and Bob’s even smarter, working together they would A) be twice as smart, B) be half as smart or C) form a task force and get nothing done. According to new research, the answer is none of the above. It would _1_.
What makes a group good at what it does? A team of scientists _2_ and divided volunteers into groups of two to five. And they asked these groups to perform a variety of tasks, from brainstorming answers to questions like “What can you do with a brick?” to team typing blocks of complicated text.
What the researchers found is that the intelligence of individual group members was not a good predictor of how well the group as a whole performed. The teams _3_: their members interacted well, took turns speaking and included more females than groups that did poorly. The study is in the journal Science.
So if you’re _4_ , don’t automatically reach for the biggest brains. _5_. And at least one person knows who knows what to do with a brick.
actually depend on how well they get along put their collective heads together that did best rated high in social sensitivity looking for a recipe for group smart Try adding some heart
一人天资聪颖，另一人更胜一筹，这两位要是合作的话会怎样？ A) 事半功倍 B) 事倍功半 C) 互相推托，一事无成 最新一项研究表明，这三个选项都不是合适的答案，事实上，这两人相处得如何才是问题的关键。 造就一支优秀的团队靠的是什么呢？一支研究团队集思广益，他们将受试者分成几组，人数从2至5人不等，并让各组完成指定任务，从回答“一块砖可以用来干什么”之类问题的头脑风暴到团队合作输入复杂文本等等，任务形式各异。 经研究发现，各小组成员的智力并不是整组表现的决定性因素。表现突出的小组社交敏感性较高：组员互动有利，各抒己见，且女性成员较多。这项研究报告发表在《科学》上。 假如你想找一剂提升团队能力良方，别习惯性地去拉拢高智商人才，得多留心，至少得找一个知道砖头可以干嘛用的组员~