Both the reading passage and the lecture talks about TOPIC. While the author states that A , the professor firmly holds the opposite view which indicates that Ā
According to the lecture, Ā1.details. All these observations are contradictive to what the reading passage offers.
Meanwhile, the professor claims that Ā2。details.However, the reading proposes that A2。
Finally, the reading passage contends that A3。On the contrary, the lecturer finds that Ā3. He points out that details.
In summary, the lecturer lists three convincing sides to rebut what the reading passage suggests. Ā1，2，3.
The lecturer rejects the ideas presented in the reading passage about TOPIC. In her opinion, Ā.
The lecturer does not agree with the first point made in the reading—A1. She contends that details.
The lecturer goes on to refute the claim in the reading that A2, as details. On the contrary, she argues, Ā, details.
Additionally, the lecturer challenges A3 mentioned in the reading. The lecturer reminds us Ā3, details.
In the reading material, the author states that A. However in the listening material, the professor refutes that the argument is unconvincing.
First, according to the reading passage, the author suggests that A1. However in the listening, the professor claims that Ā1.details.
Second, the author in the reading material mentions that A2. Unfortunately the professor argues that Ā2. details
Finally, the author of the reading passage asserts that A3. In the contrary it obviously contradicts with the listening passage in which the professor contends that Ā3. details
In conclusion, according to the listening material, the argument that A is unwarranted.
· 小编推荐 ·