人性是该遵从还是完善？Tal博士告诉你一个不一样的答案。


PS:口误的地方不需要写，此篇有两处口误。



【听写回顾】点击回顾上一期听写：什么是积极心理学»
Human nature must be obeyed versus human nature must be perfected. This in many ways, captures conflict that has gone throughout human history, whether you look at politics, whether you look at religion, whether you look at philosophy, as well as today, psychology. How do we look at human nature? Is human nature flawed and therefore needs to be perfected? Or is human nature flawed, maybe there's something that we don't like about it but we need to accept it and work with it? I'm going to argue for the latter of what I just said, for the fact that human nature needs to be obeyed with all its flaws, with all its shortcomings, as opposed to attempting to perfect it on a psychological level.
人性应该顺从亦或是完善?这个问题在多方面反映出人类历史上的许多冲突，无论是政治上，还是宗教上，无论是哲学，还是心理学。我们该如何看待人性？是人性有缺陷，因此需要进一步完善吗？还是尽管我们不喜欢人性中的缺陷，也必须接受它？我赞成后者，就是说我们必须顺从于人性，接受它所有的缺陷和不足，而不是试图从心理层面上完善它。