随着教育领域综合改革的不断深化，我国教育服务体系日趋完善，但当前教育领域供给侧产品，还不能满足群众日益增长的多样化、个性化需求。这种矛盾具体表现在：由中国经济快速发展和城镇化迅猛发展所引发的高端教育需求正在严重外溢，对数以亿计的进城务工人员及其子女的教育服务依然不足。

　　

With the continuous deepening of the comprehensive reform of education, China's education service system is becoming more and more perfect, but the current education supply side products, but also can not meet the growing diversity of the masses, personalized needs. This contradiction is embodied in: China by rapid economic development and urbanization caused by the rapid development of the demand for high-end education is serious spillover, migrant workers and their children through billions of education services is still insufficient.

　　

与此同时，教育事业内部特殊教育、留守儿童、教师等不同领域、不同群体对教育服务的个性化需求，面对社会实际所能提供的教育供给难以得到满足，呈现出明显的有效供给不足矛盾。

　　

At the same time, demand for personalized education within the special education, and teachers left-behind children in different areas, different groups of educational services, facing the social reality can provide the supply of education is difficult to be met, showing a significant shortage of effective supply.

　　

“十三五”时期的中国教育面临的问题是：中国教育如何向社会提供满足不同层次教育需求的优质教育？

　　

"Chinese education problems in 13th Five-Year" period is: how to meet the social Chinese education to provide quality education needs of different levels of education?

　　

对于教育供给侧结构性改革中凸显的类似问题如何破解，民进中央副主席、第十二届全国政协常委朱永新认为，根据现有的政策走向，未来几年，我国教育领域的供给侧改革的方向，或在于着力促进高中和大学教育多样化发展，落实学校办学自主权，探索多种办学模式，力求将高端教育需求留在国内。同时，市场机制将可能在创新和扩大教育服务多样化供给方面发挥更大作用，通过消除社会资本进入教育领域“玻璃门”的方式，调动社会力量参与和支持教育的积极性。

　　

For similar education highlights the problem of supply side structural reforms in how to crack Zhu Yongxin, vice chairman of the Central Committee, the twelfth CPPCC Standing Committee believes that under the existing policy, the next few years, the supply side reform of our country in the field of education direction, or in efforts to promote the diversification of education in high school and college, the implementation of the school autonomy and explore a variety of educational mode, and strive to be the high-end education needs to stay at home. At the same time, the market mechanism will likely play a greater role in the innovation and expansion of education service supply diversification, through the elimination of social capital into the field of education "glass door", actively mobilize social forces to participate in and support education.